Pronunciation: [wɒst ɐblˈe͡ɪz] (IPA) 
The correct spelling of the phrase "wast ablaze" is actually "was ablaze." The word "was" is the past tense form of the verb "to be," while "ablaze" means on fire or burning brightly. The IPA phonetic transcription for "was ablaze" would be /wɑz əˈbleɪz/. It's important to pay attention to proper spelling and pronunciation to effectively communicate and avoid any misunderstandings.
"Wast ablaze" is an archaic phrase derived from Middle English usage and is no longer commonly used in modern language. The term is a combination of two words: "wast" and "ablaze."
The word "wast" is the second-person singular form of the verb "to be" in the past tense, specifically used in old English poetry. It denotes an action that took place in the past or refers to a state of being that was present at a certain time in the past. It is an archaic and poetic form of "were" or "was."
Meanwhile, "ablaze" is an adjective that describes something or someone being on fire or engulfed in flames. It represents a state of intense and high-reaching fire, often characterized by bright and fierce flames. It can also be used metaphorically to describe intense feelings, passion, or excitement.
Therefore, when combined, the phrase "wast ablaze" can be interpreted as an archaic and poetic way of expressing that something was on fire or vehemently burning in the past. This phrase might have been used in ancient texts, literature, or poetry, but it has lost its currency in contemporary language.
