The phrase "be at odds with" refers to a state of disagreement, conflict, or opposition between two or more individuals, groups, ideologies, or opinions. When two parties are "at odds," they have differing views, interests, or goals that prevent them from finding common ground or reaching a mutual understanding. This expression often implies a sense of opposition, animosity, or incompatibility between the conflicting parties.
Being "at odds with" can encompass various contexts, such as personal relationships, political debates, or philosophical disputes. In a personal relationship, individuals may be at odds when they have conflicting desires, values, or beliefs that prevent them from finding harmony or agreement. In politics, different parties or factions can be at odds when they hold divergent views or policies regarding important issues. Moreover, in philosophical or intellectual debates, individuals or schools of thought can be at odds when they hold conflicting theories, concepts, or approaches.
Being "at odds with" suggests a lack of agreement or alignment in fundamental perspectives, principles, or actions. This can result in tension, arguments, or even hostility between the parties involved. Resolving being at odds often requires open and respectful communication, willingness to listen to different viewpoints, and a sincere effort to find common ground or compromise. However, in some cases, being at odds may be irreconcilable, leading to a long-standing state of conflict or discord.
